Baldy questions extremism Army access and BfV review

Oct 5

In Baldy’s complete second-round slot, Selen says right-wing extremism remains a major concern: younger clandestine violent networks, international online milieus and the New Right’s strategy of normalizing anti-constitutional narratives coexist and sometimes connect through events and personal networks. Asked about a reported Identitarian guest at a non-public May army event in Munster, Rosenberg first notes growing mainly right-wing extremism investigations and vigilant reporting. She says the guest attended through an official invitation beyond her remit and would welcome advance participant lists to assess access and unauthorized information gathering. The account retains Baldy’s media-report qualification. Baldy then dates abolition of the state-delegitimization category to April. Selen confirms the reclassification’s rationale and says relevant people remain monitored in right-wing, Reichsbürger or other appropriate areas, while some cease activity; he does not confirm the month. The original question’s chronology is retained as Baldy’s claim.

At the hearing Rosenberg says MAD extremism investigations have risen, mainly on the right, because radicalization is accelerating and reporting is more vigilant. She argues for removing extremists and personnel lacking constitutional loyalty and for earlier screening of guests at protected army events. In the later statistics answer she reports 13 classified extremists and 28 people lacking constitutional loyalty in the previous reporting period and describes extensive prevention training. She explicitly says those figures do not yet represent the new military-service intake and identifies no clear age pattern. Suspicion, established classification and increased reporting remain distinct.