Macron on security and fuel Budget and election choices

Date unknown

In Caroline Roux and Gilles Bouleau's Élysée interview, Emmanuel Macron denies that the CIA notified French intelligence of the reported seaborne Russian-drone attack scenario, while warning of increasing hostile acts and possible attacks on France. He describes strengthened protection of sensitive civilian, military and defense-industry sites, and avoids belligerent terminology. He calls a new Russian mobilization of about 300,000 men credible, citing intelligence and preparations, without establishing a completed call-up. His assessments of war deaths, Russian losses, territorial gains and the time needed to capture the Donbas remain his claims; he reiterates Ukraine support and briefly recalls additional radar and missile supplies. Macron recalls Monday discussions with Trump and Zelenskyy and renews a reciprocal energy/civilian-target moratorium and a Black Sea fighting moratorium to free grain. Challenged about Russian refusal, he distinguishes these from a frontline ceasefire. He says French diesel, gas and heating-oil volumes have been secured through year-end, qualifies confidence beyond that if the crisis worsens, describes reserves and a future 80-percent gas-storage target, and seeks Hormuz reopening through Iranian and Omani talks. He announces soldiers, radars and defense systems to protect Yanbu after what he describes as a Houthi attack; he presents this as defensive protection and leaves possible aircraft use dependent on developments. He proposes convening the G7 to consider coordinated strategic-reserve releases, warns that a U.S. diesel-export ban would harm global prices and the U.S. economy, and says he has no guarantee Trump will refrain. In the extended domestic debate, Macron prefers international action and targeted aid over general fuel-tax cuts, but leaves further measures, including tax reductions, open if conditions require. He defends past pandemic and energy-crisis spending and investment, accepts that social reforms were too slow and that he failed to persuade political parties, and contests the interviewers' criticism of his debt record. He describes TotalEnergies caps at €1.99 for gasoline and €2.15 for diesel. Bouleau contrasts the company's reported €300m cap cost over five months with €10bn net profits over six months; Macron favors caps while leaving excessive-margin and taxation debate open. He cites electricity-contract and electric-vehicle changes and urges continued electrification, without a new detailed program. He acknowledges understandable anger and sector-specific support, but argues that a generalized protest cannot resolve war-driven price rises and calls for unity. Asked about €54bn in proposed budget efforts, Macron defends the forthcoming budget as fair and responsible, with proportionate burdens and protection for vulnerable people, and says it is to be presented October 1. Bouleau calls the 2024 dissolution catastrophic; Macron defends it as returning the parliamentary choice to voters and describes coalition failures and a center-right relative majority. He argues another dissolution now would worsen instability, impede a budget and constrain his successor before the presidential election. He declines to decide now whether to endorse a presidential candidate, says he will act responsibly as circumstances develop, and emphasizes current duties. A closing brief previews welcoming the pope the next day; it does not establish a completed visit. The account retains claims, criticism, forecasts and schedules as aired.

TSN, citing El Mundo, reports that U.S. intelligence warned European governments about possible Russian hybrid attacks on Spain, France or Italy. The reported scenario involves Gerbera drones with a range of up to 600 kilometers launched from Russian vessels to inflict damage or political and economic disruption. The account says warnings followed CIA Director John Ratcliffe's Moscow visit; Trump called the trip routine, while press reports linked it to fears of an attack on an ally. These are attributed threat assessments, not confirmation that an attack occurred or that Ratcliffe delivered a particular warning to Putin. AUF1's September 24 account also attributes the warning to El Mundo and the CIA, but emphasizes that the newspaper presented no evidence in the account it describes. The broadcaster frames such warnings as psychological preparation for war. That is AUF1's interpretation; the footage does not independently confirm or disprove the intelligence assessment. AUF1's September 25 follow-up supplies the ship-launched-drone scenario and says there is no public CIA confirmation. It reports Italian and French pushback and quotes Guido Crosetto saying the warning is unconfirmed and warning against adding fuel to the fire. Müller-Mertens then speculates that such reports may be part of a strategy of tension involving false-flag actions. The official responses are distinct from both the original intelligence allegation and AUF1's unsubstantiated covert-strategy theory. Vremya's September 27 roundup repeats the El Mundo scenario and airs Macron saying French intelligence received no CIA alert about it. His full qualification is retained: increasing tensions and hostile actions in Europe remain concerning. This addresses the reported notification, without proving that no threat exists. The retrieved September 24 TF1/France 2 interview supplies Macron's original qualified response: he denies CIA notification, cites the Italian defense minister's denial and warns that hostile acts and tensions are increasing. This dates the official response without establishing the date of the original reported intelligence warning or independently confirming or disproving the alleged scenario. Radio Radicale's September 24 Rome discussion adds Crosetto's full firsthand response: he says Italy and the other named governments have no confirmation of the specific El Mundo account, but explicitly does not deny a possible Russian threat. He argues that Russian weapons already used in Ukraine would not require ships near Italy to reach European countries. Gentiloni agrees that the particular report lacks evidence while emphasizing that hybrid warfare is real. This supplements the reported warning and earlier retellings without establishing a confirmed plot, notification or absence of all threats.