Rodríguez defends housing Asks Junts to back decree

Sep 23

Isabel Rodríguez presents decree 26/2026 as months of negotiated work on the constitutional right to housing. She credits mobilization after Maricarmen's eviction with bringing distant positions together and says most of Junts's earlier draft is included. She describes tax support for landlords and tenants, youth purchase assistance, protected-housing VAT, vulnerable-tenant eviction suspension with regional payments and compensation for small owners, and regulation of seasonal and room rentals with a Catalan civil-law qualification. She advocates lasting affordable public housing and ratification followed by urgent processing as a bill to improve technical points. She criticizes PP's refusal and repeatedly seeks Junts's votes or abstention. Her closing return thanks supporters, reiterates the appeal and says all will win or lose together; the speech does not announce a vote result.

Tagesschau's September 27 report recounts the eviction of an 87-year-old Madrid resident from the home where she had lived for about seventy years. It says a company bought the property and substantially increased the rent, and presents the eviction as the trigger for the September 26 housing protest. Pre-broadcast Spanish reporting identifies her as Maricarmen and dates the eviction to September 23. The broadcast supplies no court ruling or subsequent resolution. Democracy Now identifies her as María del Carmen Abascal Martín and shows her hospital-bed message after police broke down her door and carried her out on a stretcher. Sabina Carrau says the dispute began with a notice seven years earlier and a demand for roughly triple the rent; she says Maricarmen remains in hospital with health needs and no alternative home as of the interview. The anchor's rent increase is phrased as more than triple. No return-home agreement or completed rehousing is reported. TV Brasil recounts the eviction and broadcasts Maricarmen's hospital-bed appeal for her experience to help others resist eviction and change the laws that allowed it. It links her case to the continuing camp and Sánchez's proposed housing response, without reporting rehousing or resolution. RTVE's September 28 evening coverage shows Maricarmen encouraging the campers from hospital and reports negotiations over her return home. Its later conditional agreement is a separate development: her approval is still pending and no return has taken place in this broadcast. Tagesschau's September 29 account again identifies Maricarmen Abascal, says she could not afford a rent increase and recalls her hospitalization after the eviction. It links her case to demonstrations spreading across Spain. The later statement that a new lease will allow her return is a separate subsequent development, not evidence that she has already moved back. In the October 2 plenary, Housing Minister Rodríguez recalls the eviction as a collective failure that accelerated political agreement and describes the elderly tenant being carried out on a stretcher. PP's Juan Bravo argues instead that the new decree would not have prevented this eviction because Article 2 permits proceeding where alternative housing exists and, he says, Madrid city and regional authorities provided an alternative. That is Bravo's claim and interpretation, retained alongside Carrau's earlier statement that Maricarmen had no alternative home; this draft does not resolve whether an offered alternative was suitable or prove either legal conclusion.