El-Sayed on war and security Defends campaign outreach

Oct 5

Martha MacCallum introduces a tight Michigan Senate race: the displayed Fox poll puts El-Sayed at 50% and Rogers at 49% among likely Michigan voters, with September 24–28 field dates and a ±3-point margin of error, and says Obama is expected to campaign with him later in the month. She attributes Islamist indoctrination and possible Ben Gurion Airport or U.S.-base-in-Jordan targets in the FlyDubai incident to UAE investigators. El-Sayed thanks the captain and Israeli passengers, condemns terrorism and rejects blaming victims while arguing that U.S. policy should reduce violence. He opposes the Iran war, says Obama's nuclear agreement contained the threat, and blames Trump's choices for higher household costs and military losses. MacCallum disputes his nuclear-compliance and Hormuz-flow account, cites a Wall Street Journal assessment of recovering oil supply and argues that national security requires confronting threats; she later says she is presenting another perspective, and acknowledges opposition to the war. El-Sayed cites eighteen service members killed, deployments and inadequate supplies, invokes Iraq's costs and criticizes Rogers and VA defunding. Asked about Muslim Brotherhood branches in Lebanon, Egypt and Jordan, he repeatedly makes support for terror designations conditional on organizations engaging in or calling for political violence, then rejects more war as the answer. MacCallum reads Piker's New York Magazine remarks expressing confidence that El-Sayed would hold Israel accountable despite distancing himself. El-Sayed says the campaign concerns gas, groceries and medical access, calls his interviews with Piker and Fox a way to reach audiences, and questions Trump's war and Canada tariffs. The complete published first part closes with a break and a preview of a separate domestic-policy discussion.

During his October 5 Fox interview, Abdul El-Sayed says the Iran war should not have been fought and has made Americans less safe while increasing Michigan's fuel, grocery and tax costs. He says Obama's nuclear agreement had contained the threat before Trump withdrew and later chose war, cites eighteen service members killed and deployment hardships, and criticizes Rogers and VA defunding while invoking Iraq's costs. MacCallum disputes his nuclear-compliance and blocked-oil-flow account, cites a Wall Street Journal assessment of recovering regional oil supply and presents the national-security case for confronting threats. She clarifies that she is offering another perspective rather than declaring support for the war and acknowledges substantial opposition. These competing claims and assessments remain attributed.