Rodríguez defends housing Asks Junts to back decree

Oct 2

Isabel Rodríguez presents decree 26/2026 as months of negotiated work on the constitutional right to housing. She credits mobilization after Maricarmen's eviction with bringing distant positions together and says most of Junts's earlier draft is included. She describes tax support for landlords and tenants, youth purchase assistance, protected-housing VAT, vulnerable-tenant eviction suspension with regional payments and compensation for small owners, and regulation of seasonal and room rentals with a Catalan civil-law qualification. She advocates lasting affordable public housing and ratification followed by urgent processing as a bill to improve technical points. She criticizes PP's refusal and repeatedly seeks Junts's votes or abstention. Her closing return thanks supporters, reiterates the appeal and says all will win or lose together; the speech does not announce a vote result.

On October 2, 2026, Spain's Congress of Deputies rejected Royal Decree-Law 26/2026 of September 29, the main package of urgent housing measures, by 178 votes against to 172 in favour, with no abstentions among 350 votes cast. President Francina Armengol announced that it was repealed after a public roll-call vote. This is the narrow defeat reported by ARD, whose brief identifies eviction protection in specified cases and tighter short-term-rental rules without supplying an identifier or tally. In the plenary debate, Isabel Rodríguez defended the package as a negotiated balance of tenant protection, support for small landlords and affordable-housing measures and offered urgent processing as a bill after ratification. PSOE, Sumar, ERC, EH Bildu, BNG, Podemos and Compromís backed it; PNV and Coalición Canaria expressed reservations but supported this first decree. PP, Vox, Junts and UPN opposed it, arguing that the government's approach failed on supply or harmed legal certainty and small owners. Those policy predictions and accusations remain the speakers' positions. The separate vote on decree 27/2026 is a different occurrence. Later RTVE and Tagesschau reports recap the same first-package defeat. RTVE’s legal account explains lost eviction, rent-cap, tax, short-term-rental and existing-contract-extension protections and retains uncertainty over judges’ treatment of extensions requested during brief validity. Mercedes’s complete personal follow-up describes a threatened existing lease and her pledge to stay, without a court outcome. Other RTVE political, camp and regional reactions refer to both defeats together and remain shared accounts of two distinct votes; predictions about elections and mobilization are not completed outcomes. RTVE's October 3 complete political report in show 295 retrospectively describes both defeats together and includes Redondo's criticism, Illa's disappointment, Junts's contrary policy assessment and Turull's electoral-interest allegation, with the other parties' housing/electoral responses. Retain these as a shared response to two separately identified votes, not a new combined vote or a called election.