Cornell's recorded calls Accounts and consent dispute

Oct 19–20, 2024

ABC airs calls Jane Doe recorded with Winston Lee and Matthew Ingalls three weeks after the alleged October 2024 assault at Cornell's Chi Phi house. Doe describes severe intoxication, sedatives and numerous men. Lee apologizes for the backlash, then asks why she called after she characterizes the incident as gang rape. ABC contrasts the men's explanations for the gathering with purported Snapchat invitations and a bedroom photograph. Ingalls recalls her saying she was sober and agreeing to a threesome; Doe disputes his recollection, and he later questions both their memories. All seven accused members deny wrongdoing; ABC says Lee told campus investigators there was consent and Ingalls alleged Doe assaulted him. Katersky reports two expulsions and two suspensions, naming Ingalls and Lee, and airs a campus officer explaining Lee's temporary access ban. The report ends with vandalism, a campus protest and the attorney general's office contacting Doe's lawyer. The allegations and competing recollections remain disputed.

A former Cornell student, identified as Jane Doe, alleges that multiple Chi Phi members drugged, sexually assaulted and raped her at the fraternity house in October 2024. Her later lawsuit includes a purported Snapchat screenshot said to show invitations to other members. ABC reports no criminal charges. District Attorney Matthew Van Houten says her original statement differed materially and did not allege drugging or lack of consent. One accused man's lawyer denies the allegations; another says he entered the room briefly but was absent when misconduct occurred. Cornell says it investigated under its policies and the fraternity remains barred. These are disputed allegations, not adjudicated facts. ABC's September 28 report specifies ketamine in Doe's allegation and airs her lawyer's account that an anonymous fraternity member, who was asleep during the alleged assault, later shared the Snapchat messages with her. The lawyer regards the messages as evidence of the assault; that is his assessment. The district attorney explains his earlier decision in terms of the legal threshold for incapacity and voluntary intoxication. ABC says Cornell expelled and suspended some members. A defense lawyer says his client will be exonerated and criticizes the civil suit. No conviction or grand-jury finding is reported. Fox's September 28 report says Doe's lawsuit alleges a four-hour assault by seven men after alcohol and drugs and cites alleged group-chat invitations. It airs her lawyer's criticism, the DA's account that her original statement described voluntary, conscious and consensual conduct, and his insistence on evidence. One accused man's lawyer denies that the incident occurred and condemns the lawsuit. These remain conflicting accounts, not a factual finding that the alleged assault did or did not happen. Democracy Now's September 29 report says Doe's lawyer disputes that her account has materially changed since her early police report. It quotes Van Houten defending reconsideration when additional evidence emerges and airs Ocasio-Cortez accusing elite institutions, including Cornell, of protecting abusers. Those statements are retained as the lawyer's and lawmaker's positions alongside the earlier prosecutor, university and defense accounts; they are not adjudicated findings. ABC's September 30 report obtains the original police statement and says it describes some consensual group sex, some felt coercion, fear and intoxication that impaired Doe's ability to decide. Van Houten continues to interpret it as consensual and says the vulgar Snapchat messages do not establish lack of consent. ABC also presents later texts expressing shame and discussing sexuality, followed by reassurance to one man, an accusation that he lied and a police report. Jeremy Saland says his client is innocent and that the complaint does not accuse him of rape. The original document passages and the prosecutor's interpretation remain distinct; they do not resolve the allegations. ABC's October 1 report obtains confidential campus investigation documents conveying Doe's account of feeling surrounded by multiple men, pressured ketamine use and impaired functioning. It reports investigators finding a ketamine overdose at the same house the previous night. These are attributed document/allegation accounts, not an adjudication or a replacement for the earlier prosecutor and defense positions. The complete source report also carries campus hearing responses and the DA's separately scoped planned evidence-gathering step. ABC's October 2 investigation examines further Snapchat invitations, a photograph, a recorded call, apologies from other alleged participants and Doe's texts saying ninety percent of the encounter was non-consensual and recalling ketamine. It says these materials and campus-police witness interviews did not reach the DA who previously declined charges. This supplements, rather than replaces, the previously reported original statement and competing interpretations. Hochul criticizes the forwarding of a partial record and replaces the prosecutor; that appointment is tracked separately. Cornell maintains that its investigation was thorough, several accused men deny wrongdoing and Doe's lawyer welcomes the appointment. The case remains disputed and no new adjudication is reported. Fox's October 2 report says Hochul found Doe's unequivocal rape allegation had been omitted from a written police summary. Van Houten says he relied on a signed revised statement and now says he was not provided the full picture. Defense lawyers continue to deny wrongdoing. These accounts do not resolve what occurred or establish guilt. ABC's October 4 report details disputed acts alongside the reported sanctions and examines the original police/DA record. Doe's lawyer says the six-page summary omitted her explicit rape allegation. An investigator's November 2024 memo, reviewed by ABC, says the DA's office declined further police evidence, while the DA says Cornell failed to share all materials. The lawyer calls the investigation incomplete. All seven men deny wrongdoing. This is an additional documentary/evidence-handoff account, not a finding resolving the underlying allegation or earlier competing consent accounts. ABC's October 5 report airs Jane Doe's recorded calls with Winston Lee and Matthew Ingalls, made three weeks after the alleged assault. Doe describes profound intoxication, sedatives and numerous men; Lee apologizes for the backlash before questioning the call's purpose, while Ingalls recalls sobriety and agreement to a threesome and later questions both their memories. ABC contrasts their explanations with purported Snapchat invitations and a bedroom photograph. All seven deny wrongdoing; ABC says Lee told campus investigators Doe consented and Ingalls alleged she assaulted him. The recorded exchanges add source evidence and competing recollections, not an adjudicated finding. Kan's October 4 account describes the alleged conduct and initial handling assertively as rape and a cover-up, reports alcohol/ketamine and purported group-chat invitations, and explains that the initial voluntary-drug account had been interpreted as consent. This is Nathan Guttman's source framing, retained alongside the other reports' document accounts and denials. The package airs an accused man's denial and reports reopened proceedings and institutional criticism; it supplies no conviction or determination resolving the competing accounts.